<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RoHS &amp; COTS hit the DOD &#8211; Damned Wiskers!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drobnxs.com/2009/10/10/rohs-cots-hit-the-dod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drobnxs.com/2009/10/10/rohs-cots-hit-the-dod/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on cars and other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:16:21 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dr Obnxs</title>
		<link>http://www.drobnxs.com/2009/10/10/rohs-cots-hit-the-dod/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Obnxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drobnxs.com/?p=213#comment-71</guid>
		<description>I honestly don&#039;t know. I&#039;m guessing that automotive applications fall between the &quot;make it cheap throw it away&quot; mentaility of inexpensive cell phones and &quot;it needs to last 30-50 years&quot; of aerospace, but just where I have no clue. Some thing I do believe (though I don&#039;t have any hard data) is that cars of today won&#039;t be on the roads in 50 years like my 1965 Mustang is. The electronics will eventually die, there won&#039;t be good ways to replace them, and one will have to make more modern stuff work in thier stead or just trash the car. Doesn&#039;t bode well for Russo and Steele car auctions of the future! 

Here&#039;s one little story from my neighbor. He has a mid 90s Ferrari. That&#039;s not that old. One of the electronics modules in the car is a common failure point, and it&#039;s not made any more. So if it goes, what they do is gut the fancy aluminum case and put in more modern electronics to do what needs to be done. I think his car is a 91, so it&#039;s 19 years old. It&#039;s either that, or just part it out!

I don&#039;t know if tin wiskers will be the downfall of automotive electronics, but there&#039;s a pretty high chance it will contribute.

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly don&#8217;t know. I&#8217;m guessing that automotive applications fall between the &#8220;make it cheap throw it away&#8221; mentaility of inexpensive cell phones and &#8220;it needs to last 30-50 years&#8221; of aerospace, but just where I have no clue. Some thing I do believe (though I don&#8217;t have any hard data) is that cars of today won&#8217;t be on the roads in 50 years like my 1965 Mustang is. The electronics will eventually die, there won&#8217;t be good ways to replace them, and one will have to make more modern stuff work in thier stead or just trash the car. Doesn&#8217;t bode well for Russo and Steele car auctions of the future! </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s one little story from my neighbor. He has a mid 90s Ferrari. That&#8217;s not that old. One of the electronics modules in the car is a common failure point, and it&#8217;s not made any more. So if it goes, what they do is gut the fancy aluminum case and put in more modern electronics to do what needs to be done. I think his car is a 91, so it&#8217;s 19 years old. It&#8217;s either that, or just part it out!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if tin wiskers will be the downfall of automotive electronics, but there&#8217;s a pretty high chance it will contribute.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nabeshin</title>
		<link>http://www.drobnxs.com/2009/10/10/rohs-cots-hit-the-dod/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>nabeshin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drobnxs.com/?p=213#comment-70</guid>
		<description>So will these metal whiskers kill my MINI in a few years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So will these metal whiskers kill my MINI in a few years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.drobnxs.com/2009/10/10/rohs-cots-hit-the-dod/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Captian Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drobnxs.com/?p=213#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Oh, you should see RoHS steam rolling through international medical equipment manufacturers! Imagine trying to update and replace to RoHS compliant over 5,000 components in a medical linear accelerator system.

Now I have another unknown thrown into system characterizations! 

But the upside is the mandatory product recycling in the EU … We make over $10K just recycling the copper and tungsten in each machine.

Captain Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, you should see RoHS steam rolling through international medical equipment manufacturers! Imagine trying to update and replace to RoHS compliant over 5,000 components in a medical linear accelerator system.</p>
<p>Now I have another unknown thrown into system characterizations! </p>
<p>But the upside is the mandatory product recycling in the EU … We make over $10K just recycling the copper and tungsten in each machine.</p>
<p>Captain Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Obnxs</title>
		<link>http://www.drobnxs.com/2009/10/10/rohs-cots-hit-the-dod/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Obnxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drobnxs.com/?p=213#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Hi Tim, Direct the CERN engineers to the NASA site (if they don&#039;t know about it already). It has a clearing house of references to research on the subject that seems pretty up to date.

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim, Direct the CERN engineers to the NASA site (if they don&#8217;t know about it already). It has a clearing house of references to research on the subject that seems pretty up to date.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.drobnxs.com/2009/10/10/rohs-cots-hit-the-dod/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drobnxs.com/?p=213#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Hey Matt,

The problem of learning to work with RoHS-compliant solders may also be responsible for the recent problem with the LHC superconducting splices, from what I understand of it.

-Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Matt,</p>
<p>The problem of learning to work with RoHS-compliant solders may also be responsible for the recent problem with the LHC superconducting splices, from what I understand of it.</p>
<p>-Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
